[email protected] Guwahati, Assam, India

Article 50 and Parliamentary Authorisation

Advocate Armin legal case study

R (Miller) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the EU

Court: UK Supreme Court, Westminster | Year: 2017

The UK Supreme Court held that the Government could not trigger Article 50 to leave the EU without authorisation by an Act of Parliament.

R (Miller) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a major UK constitutional case heard by the UK Supreme Court in Westminster.

The issue was whether the Government could use prerogative powers to trigger Article 50 and begin withdrawal from the European Union without Parliament.

The Court held that statutory authority was required because triggering Article 50 would affect rights created by Parliament.

Key Learning Points

  • Clarified limits on executive prerogative powers.
  • Protected parliamentary sovereignty.
  • Required an Act of Parliament before Article 50 notice.
  • Useful comparative study for Indian constitutional law interns.

Intern Takeaway

Comparative law helps interns understand how constitutional systems control executive power through parliamentary authority and judicial review.

Reference: Read source material

More Case Studies

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Read More
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Read More
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
Read More
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
Read More
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Read More
Book a Consultation

Discuss This Case Study With Us