Federalism, Secularism and President’s Rule

Court: Supreme Court of India | Year: 1994

A key constitutional case restricting arbitrary use of Article 356 and affirming federalism and secularism as constitutional principles.

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India is a leading decision on federalism and the limits of President’s Rule under Article 356.

The Supreme Court held that proclamations under Article 356 are subject to judicial review and cannot be used arbitrarily to dismiss State governments.

The case is also significant for recognising secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution.

Key Learning Points

• Restricted arbitrary dismissal of State governments.
• Made President’s Rule subject to judicial review.
• Strengthened federalism.
• Recognised secularism as part of the constitutional structure.

Intern Takeaway

In federalism cases, examine both legal power and constitutional morality behind the exercise of that power.

Reference: Read source material